Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!utcsri!utegc!utai!gh
From: gh@utai.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.edu
Subject: Re: Cheating (Is it clearly definable?)
Message-ID: <3910@utai.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 16-Apr-87 21:51:46 EST
Article-I.D.: utai.3910
Posted: Thu Apr 16 21:51:46 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 17-Apr-87 04:39:34 EST
References: <1368@uwmacc.UUCP> <6487@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <1374@uwmacc.UUCP> <6548@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <1386@uwmacc.UUCP> <6567@bu-cs.BU.EDU>
Reply-To: gh@ai.UUCP (Graeme Hirst)
Organization: Dept of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Lines: 12
Summary: Cheating hurts others too.

In article <6567@bu-cs.BU.EDU> bzs@bu-cs.BU.EDU (Barry Shein) writes:
>Put it this way: If you didn't learn anything, but got the grade, you
>probably cheated, yourself (hey, but thanks for the tuition money.)

Nice, but too simple.  Every time one of these bozos goes out, proudly wearing
their "approved" stamp from my university but screwing up their job because
they aren't really qualified, the ones who suffer are my university's
reputation and next year's graduates.  When I punish someone for cheating,
the ones who benefit are all those who didn't cheat.
-- 
\\\\   Graeme Hirst    University of Toronto	Computer Science Department
////   utcsri!utai!gh  /  gh@ai.toronto.edu  /	416-978-8747