Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!seismo!nbires!isis!udenva!ttorgers
From: ttorgers@udenva.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.edu
Subject: Re: Cheating on Programming Assignments
Message-ID: <3476@udenva.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 16-Apr-87 15:27:45 EST
Article-I.D.: udenva.3476
Posted: Thu Apr 16 15:27:45 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 18-Apr-87 03:24:22 EST
References: <248@rruxa.UUCP> <274@sdacs.ucsd.EDU> <211@axis.fr> <3891@utai.UUCP> <6799@alice.uUCp>
Reply-To: ttorgers@udenva.UUCP (Troy Torgerson)
Organization: U of Denver
Lines: 20

In article <6799@alice.uUCp> ark@alice.UUCP writes:
>I think the penalty should be very simple.  If X copies from Y,
>then X should be expelled from school.  Period.  And so should
>Y, unless Y can prove that Y did not know that X had copied Y's
>work.

Isn't this a little like saying Y is guilty unless proven innocent
instead of being innocent unless proven guilty like it is supposed
to be??  This also puts the burden of proof on the accused (Y)
instead of on the accuser. . .   Pretty simple alright.


-- 
			Troy Torgerson

Email (UUCP only): 
{hplabs, seismo}!hao!udenva!ttorgers
or {boulder, cires, denelcor, ucbvax!nbires, cisden}!udenva!ttorgers

When the tough get going, the weak get screwed!