Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!pioneer!lamaster From: lamaster@pioneer.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.graphics Subject: Re: Graphics libraries that compete with DISSPLA Message-ID: <1356@ames.UUCP> Date: Thu, 23-Apr-87 20:20:24 EST Article-I.D.: ames.1356 Posted: Thu Apr 23 20:20:24 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 25-Apr-87 07:41:37 EST References: <9533@duke.cs.duke.edu> Sender: usenet@ames.UUCP Reply-To: lamaster@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov (Hugh LaMaster) Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif. Lines: 33 Keywords: DISSPLA, 2d and 3D graphics, portable graphics In article <9533@duke.cs.duke.edu> hsg@duke.cs.duke.edu (Henry Greenside) writes: >Can anyone recommend alternatives to DISSPLA for general purpose >graphic packages? My own needs are the display of output from >supercomputer simulations. Typically, I want to plot contour >plots or 3D perspective plots of data with color and labels. >DISSPLA will do the trick, but is extremely expensive to bring >up on a mainframe. I will summarize to the net if others are >interested. Thanks DI3000 is also recommended but is also expensive like DISSPLA. If you can't afford a commercial graphics package, you might consider GKS. There is a partial implementation of GKS available in the public domain (possibly available through DECUS or DEC's user software distribution catalog). Both PVI and ISSCO (now Computer Associates) have companion GKS implementations, so you might even have a portable program. Also, lots of sites use NCARLIB (from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, in Boulder, Colo.) What mainframe are you running on? Hugh LaMaster, m/s 233-9, UUCP {seismo,topaz,lll-crg,ucbvax}! NASA Ames Research Center ames!pioneer!lamaster Moffett Field, CA 94035 ARPA lamaster@ames-pioneer.arpa Phone: (415)694-6117 ARPA lamaster@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov "In order to promise genuine progress, the acronym RISC should stand for REGULAR (not reduced) instruction set computer." - Wirth ("Any opinions expressed herein are solely the responsibility of the author and do not represent the opinions of NASA or the U.S. Government")