Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: floating point ==
Message-ID: <5736@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 8-Apr-87 21:48:55 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.5736
Posted: Wed Apr  8 21:48:55 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 13-Apr-87 03:46:33 EST
References: <429@euclid.warwick.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 6

In article <429@euclid.warwick.UUCP> steve@warwick.UUCP (Steve Rumsby) writes:
>OK, now that we have decided that floating point == doesn't make a lot of sense
>and that feq(x, y, fuzz) is the way to go...

Have we decided that?  feq() has many of the same problems as ==, just
in a different regime.