Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-pcd!orstcs!go From: go@orstcs.cs.ORST.EDU Newsgroups: comp.lsi Subject: Anyone using SECS? Message-ID: <245200001@orstcs> Date: Sat, 2-May-87 14:31:00 EDT Article-I.D.: orstcs.245200001 Posted: Sat May 2 14:31:00 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 5-May-87 04:49:32 EDT Lines: 35 Nf-ID: #N:orstcs:245200001:000:1576 Nf-From: orstcs.cs.ORST.EDU!go May 2 11:31:00 1987 Bear with me if this isn't the correct spot for this... Recently, I have had an occasion to look at a communication "protocol" called SECS (Semi Equipment Communications Standard) levels 1 and 2. After reading the SEMI documents (revised 1986) I wanted to get some "feedback" from other users. At the top level, I completely understand what SECS-I and II are trying to do, but am confused on a couple of points: 1) The protocols claim to have originated before the ISO/OSI model, however, they claim an initial release of 1980. If my memory is correct, the ISO/OSI model appeared in the late 70's? They must have worked on SECS for 2 or more years in a vaccuum. 2) SECS-II, the stream/function level appears to be somewhat uncertain of its purpose: It appears as an application- layer in places, but does some of the very-low-level ack/nak stuff too. Why? This might make it cumbersome to apply on top of an existing LAN -- lots more overhead unless LAN is MUCH HIGHER SPEED than SECS message traffic. Anyway, my main question is: How widespread is the use of SECS (someone must be really chuckling over the pronunciation of the acronym by now...); is it gaining in popularity or declining? Do you recommend its use or not? Why? Should I take my question elsewhere (...dcom) ? Since is it for semiconductor manufacturers I thought I would start here. Thanks. I'd be glad to post results to net, and all that. Please mail responses to me for now. Gary Oliver ...!hplabs!hp-pcd!orstcs!go