Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!ECNCDC.BITNET!MISS049
From: MISS049@ECNCDC.BITNET.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: 128 CP/M COMPATABILITY
Message-ID: <8704151621.AA05265@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Wed, 15-Apr-87 10:55:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8704151621.AA05265
Posted: Wed Apr 15 10:55:00 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 17-Apr-87 02:11:10 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 27


   I feel there are no differences except for the display
 codes for the monitor.  I have been running CP/M on the 128
 for about a year and have found no problems with running
 KAYPRO IV  CP/M 2.2 stuff.  New Word needed some help, but
 not much!!


   As for C, I have been using the BDS C compiler for several
 months with no problems.  I have seen AZTEC C run on another
 CP/M machine and I feel that the BDS C compiler is much better.
 There was a review of several CP/M compilers in a 1984 BYTE.
 If anyone is interested, I could come up with the exact issue.



____________________________________________________________________

 Ken Linder                                Western Illinois
 MISS049@ECNCDC.BITNET                       University


 KA9RVK (CW lives!!!!!)            Please acknowledge that my
                                  opinions are the product of
                                    one semi-intelligent human.

__________________________________________________________________