Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!vrdxhq!bms-at!stuart
From: stuart@bms-at.UUCP (Stuart D. Gathman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: ignorance about minix and EMS boards.
Message-ID: <380@bms-at.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 19-Apr-87 17:57:05 EST
Article-I.D.: bms-at.380
Posted: Sun Apr 19 17:57:05 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 19-Apr-87 22:45:45 EST
References: <492@gouldsd.UUCP>
Organization: Business Management Systems, Inc., Fairfax, VA
Lines: 10
Keywords: please enlighten me (just a little bit)
Summary: This would be handy all around

In article <492@gouldsd.UUCP>, mjranum@gouldsd.UUCP (Marcus J Ranum) writes:

> of EMS is software controlled, and how much hardware ? Can MINIX cope

MINIX will cope by ignoring EMS.  A very useful enhancement to the RAM
disk driver, however, would be EMS support.  This would not even be very
difficult.  Too bad I don't have any EMS.  An EMS RAM disk would give
another 240K for programs.  You could even run a second user.
-- 
Stuart D. Gathman	<..!seismo!dgis!bms-at!stuart>