Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!decwrl!sun!dlb!plx!ed From: ed@plx.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Next Amiga Message-ID: <596@plx.UUCP> Date: Mon, 13-Apr-87 11:53:40 EST Article-I.D.: plx.596 Posted: Mon Apr 13 11:53:40 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 15-Apr-87 01:16:11 EST References: <8704120454.AA21439@ingres.Berkeley.EDU> Organization: Plexus Computers, San Jose, CA. Lines: 34 Summary: Amiga 2000 In article <8704120454.AA21439@ingres.Berkeley.EDU>, hatcher@INGRES.BERKELEY.EDU (Doug Merritt) writes: > In article <594@plx.UUCP> ed@plx.UUCP (Ed Chaban) writes: > >In article <15999@amdcad.AMD.COM>, tim@amdcad.AMD.COM (Tim Olson) writes: > >> Better yet, leap-frog *everyone* and put in an Am29000. [ ... ] > > > >Oh Great!! now we can use an obscure CPU with our obscure operating > >system and bizarre Bus standards. Use your HEAD man! Do you realize > >how much it costs to jump from one CPU to another? How many Apple II's > >do you see getting sold? Do you have it *IN* for the existing AMIGA > >product line? > > Although the tone of this posting is a bit strong, I would nonetheless like to > extend personal thanks to Ed for his very good taste, in that he has finally > posted something to our group that is not even indirectly abusive of the > Amiga, and hence is not necessarily inherently offensive to the audience > here. > Doug Merritt ucbvax!ingres!hatcher Thanx Doug. I'm *REALLY* impressed with the 2000 (Open Mouth- Insert Hat) My only beef is the lack of an "Standard" operating system. I can live with the strange bus since Jobs is doing likewise at NeXT. The 2000 is everything the 1000 should have been. I wonder if the 500 will be such a good idea since it will perpetuate the "Toy" image that Amiga so desperately needs to shake. Now, all we need is a port of USELESSNIX and a 68020 card. Apple's price is too high as far as the MacII is concerned. The question remains: Will Commodore embrace UNIX? -ed-