Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!ccplumb From: ccplumb@watmath.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Matt's new DME (Iconifying!) Message-ID: <12898@watmath.UUCP> Date: Fri, 17-Apr-87 02:51:29 EST Article-I.D.: watmath.12898 Posted: Fri Apr 17 02:51:29 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 18-Apr-87 03:01:21 EST References: <8704031013.AA17765@cory.Berkeley.EDU> <12795@watnot.UUCP> <394@george.paul.RUTGERS.EDU> Reply-To: watmath!ccplumb (Colin Plumb) Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 35 Confusion: U. of Waterloo, Ontario dpz@paul.RUTGERS.EDU (David P. Zimmerman) says (in <394@george.paul.RUTGERS.EDU>): >I write: >> - It should be possible to rearrange them front-to-back. > >> How about having one click bring it to the front, >> two send it to the back? > >But that would open it, no? How about pressing both buttons to move >it to the back? Thus, one click brings it forward, holding the button >moves it around, double clicking opens it, and clicking on both >buttons simultaneously shoves it to the back. I made the above comment just after noting how under-utilized the right mouse button is. I thought it was clear I was referring to using the right-hand button. >> are. (Note: I think using shift/alt/control/meta/super/hyper/ >> top/greek - mouse button combinations is a loss. You have to look >> at the keyboard to find the key to hold.) > >I don't think it is that bad of a loss. Actually, speaking of X, I >absolutely love how flexible it is (under uwm), although I agree that >the shift/alt family gets on my nerves now and then. Suntools is >somewhat flexible, and it would be nice if the Workbench was up to >that level of flexibility, but X beats them both. Oh, yes, it's nice, and I don't mind using them for more obscure features, but I think they should be avoided for elementary things. >David P. Zimmerman rutgers!dpz dpz@rutgers.edu -- -Colin Plumb (watmath!ccplumb) Silly quote: Don't count your chickens until the barn door is closed.