Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!cbmvax!andy From: andy@cbmvax.cbm.UUCP (Andy Finkel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Harddisks for Amiga 2000 Message-ID: <1767@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> Date: Mon, 27-Apr-87 10:36:12 EDT Article-I.D.: cbmvax.1767 Posted: Mon Apr 27 10:36:12 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 28-Apr-87 01:36:44 EDT References: <814@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> Reply-To: andy@cbmvax.UUCP (Andy Finkel) Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA Lines: 34 Keywords: Harddisks Amiga2000 AmigaDOS In article <814@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> hsgj@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu (Dan Green) writes: > >Now here's the question for Commodore or other parties in the know. >I also have heard that the Commodore-supplied RAM: driver "bypasses" a lot >of AmigaDOS so that it can get extra speed. It doesn't really bypass AmigaDOS...rather the RAM: handler has its own file handler which is quite a bit faster because it makes some assumptions about its physical media. >So the question is, >(a) will Commodore be providing an upgraded AmigaDOS that has improved >speed for hard disks, (b) will CBM write a HD Handler that will bypass >AmigaDOS to get full speed, or (c) will developers such as ASDG write >their own handlers to get full speed hard disk performance? We are currently doing bug-wringing on a filesystem handler for hard disks, that knows a bit about hard disks, and is able to get increased performance. (It works with the current AmigaDOS 1.2, through AmigaDOS's ability to use alternate filesystems) (That answers (a) and (b), I suppose. When ? Ah..in the fullness of time, at the appropriate juncture, in..., no, seriously, when we trust it.) > >-- Dan Green -- andy finkel {ihnp4|seismo|allegra}!cbmvax!andy Commodore/Amiga /or/ pyramid!amiga!andy } "Do not meddle with the affairs of wizards, for it makes them soggy and hard to light." Any expressed opinions are mine; but feel free to share. I disclaim all responsibilities, all shapes, all sizes, all colors.