Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbatt!neoucom!wtm
From: wtm@neoucom.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: The New IBM Wonder-Toys (really tileing vs stacking)
Message-ID: <557@neoucom.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 28-Apr-87 22:12:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: neoucom.557
Posted: Tue Apr 28 22:12:48 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 30-Apr-87 06:43:21 EDT
References: <1177@spice.cs.cmu.edu> <1495@cadovax.UUCP> <556@neoucom.UUCP> <304@mcdsun.UUCP>
Organization: Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine
Lines: 11
Keywords: PC AT XT PS/2 barf aggh ugh
Summary: tiling == OK on a big enuf screen


I thought I'd reply to Fred's response to my article about desiring
to be able to stack windows in OS/2.  I agree that side-by-side
windows on something of the resolution of a sun screen makes tiling
acceptible.  Even the new ibm screens don't have really adequate
resolution.  I'd also like to be able to make the choice- with
stackable windows; you can still tile if you want.

Soooo, you're right!

  --Bill  (wtm@neoucom.UUCP)