Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ucla-cs!sdcrdcf!burdvax!bpa!cbmvax!grr
From: grr@cbmvax.cbm.UUCP (George Robbins)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.graphics
Subject: Re: PC2 Graphics beats Amiga
Message-ID: <1794@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 30-Apr-87 11:18:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: cbmvax.1794
Posted: Thu Apr 30 11:18:20 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 2-May-87 14:40:54 EDT
References: <500@titan.camcon.co.uk> <3062@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU>
Reply-To: grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins)
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 19
Keywords: Kill this subject quick
Xref: mnetor comp.sys.amiga:4384 comp.graphics:584

In article <3062@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> hutch@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU (Jim Hutchison) writes:
>
>Correction, *fewer* colors & no flicker.  Why 70 Hz, 65 would be very
>stable, and they could use the rest of the bandwidth for something useful
>like blitting.

	Uh, they use shift-register "video" rams which means bandwidth is
	not a real issue.  This is pretty easy on the simplistic display
	model that IBM implements.
>
>I still lust after the Amiga 2000 with the 68020/68881 co-processor,
>and a darker side likes the 8088 and its PC slave slots.

	These sound like healthy impulses to me.  8-)

-- 
George Robbins - now working for,	uucp: {ihnp4|seismo|rutgers}!cbmvax!grr
but no way officially representing	arpa: cbmvax!grr@seismo.css.GOV
Commodore, Engineering Department	fone: 215-431-9255 (only by moonlite)