Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!mcnc!ecsvax!ranger From: ranger@ecsvax.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: Comments on old computer series software Message-ID: <2948@ecsvax.UUCP> Date: Fri, 24-Apr-87 10:03:00 EST Article-I.D.: ecsvax.2948 Posted: Fri Apr 24 10:03:00 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 25-Apr-87 11:57:19 EST References: <8704220554.aa00421@SPARK.BRL.ARPA> Organization: UNC Educational Computing Service Lines: 29 Summary: Software support for older Apple //s... Some marketing surveys have been done that show that 80% of microcomputer software purchases are made by new computer owners. To interpret this we need a few relevent facts. First nearly 3 million Apple //e and //c machines are in the field. About half a million ][+ machines are in the field. Production of the ][+ stopped with the introduction of the //e in 1983. Production of the //c and //e is still in effect (for now anyway) . If you look at the way the software industry treated the Apple ][+ you can get an idea of how it will treat the //e and //c once those machines go out of p production. It took nearly 2 years before Apple //e only software came out. That was after production stopped completely on the ][+. Since there are so many //e, //c machines in the field (20% of 3 million is 600,000 machines) it will be awhile before the manufacturers completely stop //e, //c development. It certainly won't be untill after those machine are out of production. The //e and //c are still outselling the higher priced //gs, but the gs will come on strong as supply catches up and //gs only software hits the streets that does significantly more than //e, //c software. As a rough guess I'd say that the //e, //c software industry has another 2 to 3 years or good sales before things really start falling off. Most will have switched to almost exclusively //gs production by then. This assumes that Apple will phase out the //e and //c as the //gs production goes up and its price goes down. I presume that Apple will replace the //c with a portable version of the //gs. Disclaimer: All of the above is pure conjecture derived by gazing ito a crystal ball. Rick Fincher ranger@ecsvax