Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!HDETUD1.BITNET!RCOPROB
From: RCOPROB@HDETUD1.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Speeding up Uniterm / Kermit
Message-ID: <8704230624.AA01358@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Thu, 23-Apr-87 02:25:17 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8704230624.AA01358
Posted: Thu Apr 23 02:25:17 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 25-Apr-87 00:10:42 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 22

Date: Thu, 23 Apr 87 04:49:44 MET
To: info-atari16@score.STANFORD
From: RCOPROB@HDETUD1
Return-Receipt-To: RCOPROB@HDETUD1.BITNET
Subject: Speeding up Uniterm / Kermit

Date: 23 April 1987, 04:48:43 MET
From: Rob van Hoboken           +31 15 78-3813       RCOPROB  at HDETUD1
To:   INFO-ATARI16 at SCORE

I've been uploading some data using two implementations of Kermit.
I don't understand the results, who can enlighten me?
The modem I'm using is 1200 baud, I'm loading from CMS/Kermit to my 1040-ST.

When I use the UNITERM 1.7b implementation, it takes about 26 minutes to
transfer 10 kilobytes of data !!! (about 6 chars / sec ??)

When I'm using Bernhard Nebel's implementation (v 1.02) it only takes
2.5 minutes. That's 60+ characters per second.

Is there any way to tune Uniterm? Is it always so slow?
Or is it a "user error"?