Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!sansom
From: sansom@trwrb.UUCP (Richard Sansom)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Good ole objective (sic) ST owners
Message-ID: <1853@trwrb.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 4-May-87 11:37:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: trwrb.1853
Posted: Mon May  4 11:37:03 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 5-May-87 04:48:58 EDT
References: <1970@hoptoad.uucp> <5929@ism780c.UUCP>
Reply-To: sansom@trwrb.UUCP (Richard Sansom)
Organization: TRW EDS, Redondo Beach, CA
Lines: 32

In article <623@elmgate.UUCP> jdg@aurora.UUCP (Jeff Gortatowsky) writes:
>...As I said  A) EMAIL!! NOT THE NET.  Can't you read!!???

** FLAME ON **
Listen, Jeff, if you don't want to be flamed in public, then DON'T POST
SUCH BIASED AND PROVOCATIVE ARTICLES TO THE NET!!!
** FLAME OFF **

Despite the fact that your remarks about the ST are apparently based on
your own personal experiences, you have no right to make statements such as
the following:

>...The ST community at large does not know the meaning of the
>word 'knowledgeable'...
>...B) Atari owners are fanatic (and somewhat blind).

In fact, even though most of the Amiga owners I know are computer
illiterates, I don't believe for a moment that they are representative of
Amiga owners in general - and I surely wouldn't go looking for a fight by
posting that opinion on the comp.sys.amiga newsgroup if I did (haven't
you ever heard of Netiquette?).

To sum it all up: there is no way you are going to be able to post such
inflammatory remarks about ANYONE's computer and expect to get nothing in
return.

-Rich
-- 
   /////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
  /// Richard E. Sansom                   TRW Electronics & Defense Sector \\\
  \\\ {decvax,ucbvax,ihnp4}!trwrb!sansom  Redondo Beach, CA                ///
   \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////////////////////////