Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!styx!ptsfa!ihnp4!cbatt!osu-eddie!bob
From: bob@osu-eddie.UUCP (Bob Sutterfield)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x,comp.sys.dec
Subject: Re: Re: re: the status of prang.
Message-ID: <3482@osu-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 1-May-87 10:12:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: osu-eddi.3482
Posted: Fri May  1 10:12:52 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 3-May-87 01:13:35 EDT
References: <8704271721.AA18645@violet.berkeley.edu> <530002@hpcea.HP.COM> <6507@mimsy.UUCP>
Sender: news@osu-eddie.UUCP
Reply-To: bob@osu-eddie.UUCP (Bob Sutterfield)
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept of Computer & Information Science
Lines: 15
Keywords: DEC Field-Service Educational-Relationship attention
Summary: Is DEC listening to this as closely as the rest of us are?
Xref: mnetor comp.windows.x:676 comp.sys.dec:170

Is anybody inside DEC watching this discussion?  Does DEC's local
Field Service in Berkeley (or at whatever level the decisions are
being made) know how incredibly widely their problems are being
exposed?  And how many people are being inconvenienced?  And how many
bad impressions are being made about DEC's otherwise-pretty-good Field
Service organization, or about DEC's educational relationship policy
makers?  Particularly among people who are in positions to influence
purchasing decisions about lots and lots of hardware in universities?

Just wondering...
-=-
 Bob Sutterfield, Department of Computer and Information Science
 The Ohio State University; 2036 Neil Ave. Columbus OH USA 43210-1277
 bob@ohio-state.{arpa,csnet} or ...!cb{osgd,att}!osu-eddie!bob
 (614)292-7348 (office) or -0915 (operators) or -7325 (answering machine)