Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!gatech!gitpyr!jkg
From: jkg@gitpyr.gatech.EDU (Jim Greenlee)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: ARC 5.20 UUENCODE - my two cents' worth
Message-ID: <3447@gitpyr.gatech.EDU>
Date: Fri, 17-Apr-87 20:01:32 EST
Article-I.D.: gitpyr.3447
Posted: Fri Apr 17 20:01:32 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 19-Apr-87 13:11:46 EST
References: <434@csm9a.UUCP> <111@unimuc.UUCP>
Reply-To: jkg@gitpyr.UUCP (Jim Greenlee)
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology
Lines: 24

RE: posting of binaries in general (and ARC520 in particular)

There has been quite a bit of traffic in the last few weeks regarding
current versions of ARC and PKARC, compatibilities, etc. Included among 
the postings were numerous requests for the latest versions of both.

I agree that it is probably better to "test the market" (so to speak)
before posting binaries to the net, but in this case, I think the 
posting was warranted. I, for one, wanted to upgrade to version 5.20
(even though I have version 5.12 and rarely use ARC, having gotten 
accustomed to the faster PKARC) since I occasionally distribute archives
to friends.

I don't ordinarily read any bulletin boards, so if it doesn't get posted
to USENET, I don't get it. I thought Dale's posting was both timely and
appropriate (BTW, more thanks to Dale for his 3D postings -  my kids love 
them :-).

						Jim Greenlee
-- 
The Shadow...!{akgua,allegra,amd,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo,ut-ngp}!gatech!gitpyr!jkg

Jryy, abj lbh'ir tbar naq qbar vg! Whfg unq gb xrrc svqqyvat jvgu vg hagvy lbh
oebxr vg, qvqa'g lbh?!