Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!infotel!pollux!bobkat!m5d
From: m5d@bobkat.UUCP (Mike McNally )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m68k,comp.sys.intel
Subject: The IBM Connection
Message-ID: <882@bobkat.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 16-Apr-87 10:18:58 EST
Article-I.D.: bobkat.882
Posted: Thu Apr 16 10:18:58 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 19-Apr-87 10:29:02 EST
References: <362@sbcs.UUCP> <1466@ncr-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM> <580@plx.UUCP> <532@pdp.cs.OHIOU.EDU> <537@pdp.cs.OHIOU.EDU>
Reply-To: m5d@bobkat.UUCP (Mike McNally (Man Insane))
Organization: Digital Lynx, Inc; Dallas, TX
Lines: 17
Xref: mnetor comp.sys.m68k:360 comp.sys.intel:157

In article <537@pdp.cs.OHIOU.EDU> galen@pdp.cs.OHIOU.EDU (Douglas Wade Needham) writes:
> . . .  The figures I heard were aprox. 50-60 percent.  Steve McReady
>says is is aprox. 7 percent now.  . . .

Just of of idle curiosity, does anybody have some real facts about the
extent of IBM control over Intel?  When I left Intel, IBM had recently
made the first big move and got something like 12.5%.  Has this
changed?

Once again, I am not a corporate raider or nasty Motorola fiend or
anything, just curious.

-- 
Mike McNally, mercifully employed at Digital Lynx ---
    Where Plano Road the Mighty Flood of Forest Lane doth meet,
    And Garland fair, whose perfumed air flows soft about my feet...
uucp: {texsun,killer,infotel}!pollux!bobkat!m5d (214) 238-7474