Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!sdcsvax!jww From: jww@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU (Joel West) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: PLEASE READ THIS POST Message-ID: <3026@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> Date: Tue, 21-Apr-87 19:33:21 EST Article-I.D.: sdcsvax.3026 Posted: Tue Apr 21 19:33:21 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 23-Apr-87 03:20:14 EST References: Organization: Western Software Technology, Vista, CA Lines: 21 In article , rs4u#@ANDREW.CMU.EDU (Richard Siegel) writes: > I've received a number of comments that the Juggler info's also in InfoWorld. > > I would venture to say that someone ELSE violated > their nondisclosure agreement, and the InfoWorld should know > about such things and not publish. It's the role of a newspaper or magazine to publish what they know. I think Apple understands this, and is more upset at the people who leak to InfoWorld than InfoWorld itself. (Now if they told IW the straight skivvy under non-disclosure, as they have other magazines, that would be a different story.) As I'm sure you know by now, the rumors printed about unannounced products do not turn out to be 100% accurate. In fact, some companies (IBM and occasionally Apple) deliberately introduce inaccuracies into what they tell others to trace the source of the leak. -- Joel West {ucbvax,ihnp4}!sdcsvax!jww (ihnp4!gould9!joel once I fix news) jww@sdcsvax.ucsd.edu if you must