Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!panda!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!uvacs.UUCP!uucp
From: uucp@uvacs.UUCP.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.pyramid
Subject: Submission for mod-computers-pyramid
Message-ID: <8704252057.AA01302@uvacs.cs.virginia.edu>
Date: Sat, 25-Apr-87 15:57:23 EDT
Article-I.D.: uvacs.8704252057.AA01302
Posted: Sat Apr 25 15:57:23 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 1-May-87 01:17:21 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 17

Path: uvacs!virginia!umd5!brl-adm!seismo!ut-sally!im4u!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!FLASH.BELLCORE.COM!karn
From: karn@FLASH.BELLCORE.COM (Phil R. Karn)
Newsgroups: mod.computers.pyramid
Subject: Re: Pyramid RAM
Message-ID: <8704241516.AA11387@flash.bellcore.com>
Date: 24 Apr 87 15:16:28 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 6


        Last time I looked, Pyramid had no competition in memory sales for their        machines.  The market is (or was) too small to interest the 3rd party
        memory industry.  Also, Pyramid's memory price is not out of line with what
        other companies charge for memories when they have no competition.  How do
        you think they sell the CPU's so cheap?
                                                        Dave Sincoskie