Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!brl-adm!adm!cross%wsu.csnet@RELAY.CS.NET
From: cross%wsu.csnet@RELAY.CS.NET (George Cross)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Sequent vs. Encore
Message-ID: <7037@brl-adm.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 22-Apr-87 01:37:12 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-adm.7037
Posted: Wed Apr 22 01:37:12 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 23-Apr-87 03:44:24 EST
Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA
Lines: 15

Hi,
  We are considering two roughly comparable Sequent and Encore models;
8 processor of 32032; around $150K. Would appreciate any comments on
these machines including maintenance response, quality of the 4.2
port, and reliability from users.  Planned use is for parallel
processing research with a small number of knowledgeable users. If I
get enough responses, I will share them.  Thanks.
 
 ---- George

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 George R. Cross                cross@wsu.CSNET
 Computer Science Department    cross%wsu@csnet-relay.ARPA
 Washington State University    faccross@wsuvm1.BITNET
 Pullman, WA      99164-1210    Phone: 509-335-6319 or 509-335-6636