Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!oliveb!pyramid!prls!gordon
From: gordon@prls.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: uda50 delay settings
Message-ID: <3273@prls.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 23-Apr-87 12:28:13 EST
Article-I.D.: prls.3273
Posted: Thu Apr 23 12:28:13 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 25-Apr-87 05:24:24 EST
References: <147@tijc02.UUCP>
Reply-To: gordon@prls.UUCP (Gordon Vickers)
Organization: Philips Research Labs, Sunnyvale, California
Lines: 22
Xref: utgpu comp.unix.questions:1825 comp.unix.wizards:1857

In article <147@tijc02.UUCP> seb022@tijc02.UUCP (Scott Bemis         ) writes:
>
>
>From: Scott Bemis   mcnc!rti-sel!tijc02
( several lines deleted - gpv)
>	According to my DEC Field Service rep., there are three delay
>	settings for UDA50 controllers. They are 10 milliseconds,  6.2
>	milliseconds, and 0 milliseconds. I would like to know if any
>	one has had any problems using the 0 milliseconds delay on the
>	UDA50 disk controllers. 


  I'd like to know what the trade offs are i.e. what considerations should
 be made in decideing which delay is appropriate.
    Thank-you,

 Gordon P. Vickers, (408) 991-5370,             =======================
 Signetics Corp.                                || Ultrix-32 ver 1.2 ||
 PO Box 3409  M/S 69                            ||     VAX 11/750    ||
 Sunnyvale, California,  USA  94086             =======================
 {allegra,decvax,ihnp4,pyramid}!philabs!prls!gordon (WAS: prls!ems)
 Disclaimer:  I reserve the right to disown any of the above text.