Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!csse32.DEC.COM!mermell From: mermell@csse32.DEC.COM (Andy, CSSE DSS, ZK2-1/N71 381-2226) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: Exotic Interface Query Message-ID: <8704090458.AA11356@decwrl.dec.com> Date: Wed, 8-Apr-87 23:44:08 EST Article-I.D.: decwrl.8704090458.AA11356 Posted: Wed Apr 8 23:44:08 1987 Date-Received: Mon, 13-Apr-87 04:11:51 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 37 > "Anything you can do with the mouse, you should be able to do with the > keyboard, and vice versa." > > Why? Should I be able to enter text with my thermometer? Scan in images > with my trackball? Tell the time of day with my knob box? > > Don't be ridiculous. > > -- Charles > I'll give you 4 reasons. The first and foremost was stated by the original requester, I'll rephrase it: Some people may have handicaps which allow them to use a keyboard but not a mouse. #2: At a conference (ACM SIGCHI) I watched a demonstration of (some other company's) animation software (on some other company's PC). The mouse had disappeared (either stolen or taken for safekeeping, both likely events at large trade shows). With an apology that "some actions would be clumsier to perform" the speaker went on to demonstrate *EVERY* feature in the software package, emulating the mouse from the keyboard. This sure makes a better impression than saying "well, I can do X, but not Y, without a real mouse, so let's just pretend you saw that feature" or "demo canceled, go away, don't see my product, don't want to buy it." #3: (if implemented right) it allows the cursor to be positioned to an exact pixel and then not jiggled when the button is pressed. #4: The workstation is disabled without a functioning mouse. This is frustrating and unnecessary. (for want of a $50 mouse a $40000 workstation is useless). Especially because, with a keyboard, an input device (with arrow keys, no less) still exists.