Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!BARILVM.BITNET!HANK
From: HANK@BARILVM.BITNET.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: TcpIp vs S&F
Message-ID: <8703301321.AA26219@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Mon, 30-Mar-87 08:05:27 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8703301321.AA26219
Posted: Mon Mar 30 08:05:27 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 31-Mar-87 06:11:21 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 9
Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa

I am more than well aware of all the drawbacks of S&F and what RSCS can't
do (by the way - there is a PVM version that was developed at U of Maine
that piggybacks on RSCS).  It leaves a lot to be desired and that is why
I want to see if Tcp/Ip can do the same type of functions that RSCS does
(i.e. send a file to someone w/o transmitting a password).

Thanks for all the replies.

Hank