Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!dewey!galvin From: galvin@dewey.UUCP Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: My Broadcast Message-ID: <26844.544796555@dewey> Date: Tue, 7-Apr-87 07:42:27 EST Article-I.D.: dewey.26844.544796555 Posted: Tue Apr 7 07:42:27 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 10-Apr-87 03:03:40 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 43 Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa From: Robert Allen I don't think that 'normal' users should expect that their Email be any more secure than their USMail. I don't buy this. Why should we restrict or constrain current technology based on what we are used to? There is no reason that electronic mail can't be more secure than USMail. Isn't it self-defeating to assume otherwise? From: Rudy.Nedved@h.cs.cmu.edu Encouraging people to find holes and then use them to make the local system programmers work on them is wrong. It is like encouraging people to find out if their neighbors lock their door during the day so they will. Do you really want that or do you want the theives to be caught? I want the theives to be caught and the ability to leave my door open. I don't want to fear my neighborhood or my users. This analogy doesn't hold in the internet (small i intended). It is not your neighbors you are worried about. You can live in a "friendly" network just like you can live in a "friendly" neighborhood. The problem is, your friendly network is a great deal "closer" to the unfriendly ones than your friendly neighborhood is close to unfriendly ones. Isn't this what Dan Lynch meant when he said: From: Dan Lynch What we are learning with some of the facilities for message sending is that our "internet" is very highly connected and even can be considered to be too highly connected for some forms of (even innocent) misbehavior. How do we benefit from what we have learned thus far? ... But the big thing that we need to understand is that we do not understand how to live in these highly connected internets yet. Much more research needs to happen in the area of intergroup interactions. And much more tolerance needs to be exhibited towards those who are probing the edges of all this. Jim