Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!homxb!houxm!homxc!amator
From: amator@homxc.UUCP (T.NECEDA)
Newsgroups: rec.food.drink,rec.food.cooking,news.groups,news.admin
Subject: Re: Moment of Decision
Message-ID: <226@homxc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 20-Apr-87 09:00:46 EST
Article-I.D.: homxc.226
Posted: Mon Apr 20 09:00:46 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 21-Apr-87 01:49:15 EST
References: <1775@whuts.UUCP> <18448@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel
Lines: 19
Keywords: moderated group, how decided?
Summary: i agree
Xref: mnetor rec.food.drink:345 rec.food.cooking:599 news.groups:677 news.admin:329

In article <18448@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>, max@oz.berkeley.edu.UUCP writes:
> Terry Sterkel has proposed to do a great deal of leg work, with
> obvious good intentions.  I have followed the discussion. With
> serious respect for Terry's efforts, I strongly disagree that
> we need a *moderated* wine group, with or without other drinks.
> 
> Now, one of the best things about the unmoderated groups is the 
> unpredictability and individuality of anarchic submissions.

I agree 100%. I personally like to broadcast my ignorance 
occasionally to this news.group (rec.food.drink)
and I would be less inclined to make a submission to a 
moderated group.


Tom Neceda
{akgua, allegra, houxm, ihnp4}!homxc!amator
AT&T - Bell Laboratories
# include <standard.disclaimer>