Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!mcvax!ukc!warwick!rlvd!kgd From: kgd@rlvd.UUCP Newsgroups: sci.bio,sci.astro Subject: Re: Mass extinctions Message-ID: <260@rlvd.UUCP> Date: Sun, 12-Apr-87 01:22:16 EST Article-I.D.: rlvd.260 Posted: Sun Apr 12 01:22:16 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 15-Apr-87 03:15:51 EST References: <6760@alice.uUCp> <496@uokmax.UUCP> Reply-To: kgd@rlvd.UUCP (Keith Dancey) Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Informatics Division, U.K. Lines: 30 Xref: utgpu sci.bio:278 sci.astro:836 In article <496@uokmax.UUCP> david@uokmax.UUCP (David Lee Cox) writes: >I really like this discussion, but am a little confused about a couple of >things, What would volcanoes, or meteors do that could cause mass extinctions? > If I may be brief, then atmospheric dust would be a candidate in both cases, in the same sense that thermonuclear war is predicted to lead to the well-known nuclear winter theory. Another interesting theory that I have heard put forward by Dr Clube is the possibility of meteor impact of sufficient momentum to reverse the rotation of the Earth. The molten core would continue to rotate as before, but the solid crust would be knocked into temporary reverse. Eventually, frictional forces would capture and return the crust rotation to its original direction. The proposed consequences of this being a temporary halt in the Earth's magnetic field, followed by field reversal before, eventually, returning. The temporary influx of increased solar radiation being the cause of mass extinctions and new mutations. I am in no position to verify the efficacy of this hypothesis. I have never seen the figures for the meteor mass required to do such a thing, even assuming an impact along the equatorial line in a direction opposite to the Earth's rotation. Any takers? -- Keith Dancey, UUCP: ..!mcvax!ukc!rlvd!kgd Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX JANET: K.DANCEY@uk.ac.rl Tel: (0235) 21900 ext 5716