Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mimsy!oddjob!uwvax!astroatc!johnw From: johnw@astroatc.UUCP (John F. Wardale) Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.org.usenix Subject: Re: Benchmarking the 532, 68030, MIPS, 386...at a Usenix! Message-ID: <290@astroatc.UUCP> Date: Mon, 18-May-87 16:27:03 EDT Article-I.D.: astroatc.290 Posted: Mon May 18 16:27:03 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 19-May-87 06:03:18 EDT References: <324@dumbo.UUCP> <809@killer.UUCP> <2417@homxa.UUCP> <4294@nsc.nsc.com> <2128@hoptoad.uucp> <826@rtech.UUCP> <396@gumby.UUCP> Reply-To: johnw@astroatc.UUCP (John F. Wardale) Organization: Astronautics Technology Cntr, Madison, WI Lines: 32 Summary: paging thrasher? *YES* Xref: mnetor comp.arch:1344 comp.org.usenix:188 In article <396@gumby.UUCP> larry@gumby.UUCP (Larry Weber) writes: >In article <826@rtech.UUCP> daveb@rtech.UUCP (Dave Brower) writes: >> * A paging thrasher. > A page thrasher would be >wonderful BUT it is highly dependent on I/O system, configurations, page >size, MMU ... in fact so many things that I suspect it wouldn't be >useful. Just the opposite!! People use WHOLE systems, so a benchmark that loads the WHOLE system IS a very usefull benchmark!!! before you flame, note: I agree that a loop like for ( i=start; i