Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!princeton!allegra!ulysses!mhuxt!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!j.cc.purdue.edu!i.cc.purdue.edu!arthur.cs.purdue.edu!tlh From: tlh@arthur.cs.purdue.edu.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.edu Subject: Re: Topics #3, question 4 Message-ID: <1380@arthur.cs.purdue.edu> Date: Sat, 9-May-87 13:04:31 EDT Article-I.D.: arthur.1380 Posted: Sat May 9 13:04:31 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 10-May-87 09:17:52 EDT References: <1166@super.upenn.edu.upenn.edu> Sender: news@arthur.cs.purdue.edu Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University Lines: 29 Summary: Discipline too young, and another topic for consideration In article <1166@super.upenn.edu.upenn.edu>, shaffer@operations.dccs.upenn.edu (Earl Shaffer) writes: > Hello: > > This is the third in my "questions" posting... > 4) Should there be a formal certification process (unlike the > current one) that tests CS grads on specific certification > areas (such as software engineer, UNIX/IBM systems programmer) In my view, I feel that the discipline is too young to decide what knowledge is most important and thus what knowledge would be tested in a certification process. Because I've always been a student of CS I do not know of ANY certification process (please feel free to fill me in on this point via email). As an additional topic for consideration, my undergraduate institution is requiring of its new CS majors a course in Ethics (yes, that philosophical stuff!) Although I never had a course in Ethics, I am a philosophy phreak and would be interested in how others view this. BTW it is a liberal arts university. Purdoin' it, Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas L. Hausmann | Graduate Assistant | tlh@mordred.cs.purdue.edu ( ARPA ) Dept of Computer Science | Purdue University | ...!purdue!tlh ( UUCP ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------