Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!j.cc.purdue.edu!i.cc.purdue.edu!arthur.cs.purdue.edu!narten
From: narten@percival.cs.purdue.edu (Thomas Narten)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: GNU Emacs performance
Message-ID: <1439@arthur.cs.purdue.edu>
Date: Thu, 21-May-87 11:10:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: arthur.1439
Posted: Thu May 21 11:10:54 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 23-May-87 18:27:25 EDT
Sender: news@arthur.cs.purdue.edu
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University
Lines: 7

>Is GNU Emacs a CPU hog (at least relative to vi, for example)?

Of course it is! But then, isn't vi a cpu hog relative to ed?

-- 
Thomas Narten
narten@cs.purdue.EDU or {ihnp4, allegra}!purdue!narten