Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!oliveb!pyramid!prls!philabs!micomvax!musocs!mcgill-vision!mouse
From: mouse@mcgill-vision.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: volatile question
Message-ID: <763@mcgill-vision.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 7-May-87 04:37:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: mcgill-v.763
Posted: Thu May  7 04:37:01 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 14-May-87 01:34:07 EDT
References: <7124@brl-adm.ARPA>
Organization: McGill University, Montreal
Lines: 17

In article <7124@brl-adm.ARPA>, rbbb@rice.EDU (David Chase) writes:
> How does one make the distinction (in C, as proposed by ANSI) between
> "a volatile pointer to something" and "a pointer to volatile
> something"?

Someone posted something about "char * volatile foo".  Somehow I would
prefer

(volatile char) *foo;
and
volatile (char *) foo;

Would these be legal?  Would they have the desired effects?

					der Mouse

				(mouse@mcgill-vision.uucp)