Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!ritcv!iav1917
From: iav1917@ritcv.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: MS-DOS NRO
Message-ID: <464@ritcv.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 1-Jun-87 18:51:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: ritcv.464
Posted: Mon Jun  1 18:51:16 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 3-Jun-87 02:47:25 EDT
References: <405@ritcv.UUCP> <725@thumper.UUCP> <345@polyslo.UUCP> <348@polyslo.UUCP> <6933@alice.UUCP> <1163@oliveb.UUCP>
Reply-To: iav1917@ritcv.UUCP (alan i. vymetalik)
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY
Lines: 20
Keywords: NRO
Xref: mnetor comp.lang.c:2292 comp.sys.ibm.pc:4509

[Etched along the walls of the CD's groove, the words EAT HOT LASER DEATH!]

    Ok, Netlanders...

    Since, I haven't received ANY flames on my NRO posting, I suspect that
    it's a 'hit' with many people.  I've seen the commentary fly around
    concerning function/macro calls and the resulting confusion.  I am
    also happy to hear it's being ported to SUNs and MicroVAX IIs besides
    just MS-DOS crates.  What I am curious to know is if NRO was really a
    useful posting and whether other such postings (if I can locate the
    items) would be warranted.

    E-mails are appreciated and, of course, I'll summarize to the net if
    there's sufficient interest.

    Chow,
    Alan

    Disclaimer:  All the above opinions are my own.  I paid for them!
                 I get to keep them!