Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ll-xn!husc6!hao!gatech!amdcad!tim
From: tim@amdcad.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Query: Implementation with non-zero NULL [really terminology]
Message-ID: <16947@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Date: Tue, 2-Jun-87 11:36:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdcad.16947
Posted: Tue Jun  2 11:36:22 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 4-Jun-87 05:16:47 EDT
References: <158@delftcc.UUCP> <20028@sun.uucp> <186@gass.UUCP>
Reply-To: tim@amdcad.UUCP (Tim Olson)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Sunnyvale, Ca.
Lines: 7
Keywords: C, NULL, portability

If we follow this discussion any further, can we *please* take the
effort to carefully differentiate the term "NULL" (#defined to be 0) from
"null pointer" (bit pattern used to represent pointers which don't point
to anything).  This will avoid much confusion (well I *really* meant...)

	-- Tim Olson
	Advanced Micro Devices