Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!hplabs!hplabsc!daemon
From: taylor@hpldat.UUCP (Dave Taylor)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Installation problems with 1.5b
Message-ID: <1744@hplabsc.HP.COM>
Date: Thu, 7-May-87 05:44:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: hplabsc.1744
Posted: Thu May  7 05:44:44 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 9-May-87 02:48:26 EDT
Sender: daemon@hplabsc.HP.COM
Reply-To: taylor@hpldat (Dave Taylor)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Interface Technologies Group
Lines: 32
Approved: taylor@hplabs (with 'postmail')

From: Bill Silvert <seismo!dalcs!biomel!bill@hplabs.HP.COM>
Subject: Installation problems with 1.5b
Date: Wed, 6 May 87 11:16:37 ADT

Here is an item on three problems I ran into installing ELM 1.5b, with fixes.

Here are the fixes that I needed to make to install the new patches to elm
on my machine.  While I am running Sys V, these appear to be bugs that would
affect all users (except for #2):

  1. initialize.c: change DEBUGFILE to DEBUG.  DEBUGFILE is not defined.

  2. leavembox.c: unistd.h doesn't exist on my system.  If you don't have it 
     either, all you have to do is define:
     	utimbuf { time_t actime;
		  time_t  modtime;
		  };
     This is taken from the previous version.

  3. showmsg.c: the second sprintf has a superfluous string field.
     change -- sprintf(title2, "Mailed %s %s, %d at %s%s\n",
     to     -- sprintf(title2, "Mailed %s %s, %d at %s\n",

A final comment -- I had three old versions of reply.c -- none of them
took the patches successfully, and I finally had to request reply.c from
Dave Taylor.

William Silvert, Modelling & Statistics Group
Bedford Institute of Oceanography
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CANADA

 ...!{seismo,utai}!dalcs!biomel!bill 		biomel!bill@cs.dal.cdn