Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!CRNLNS.BITNET!SYSTEM
From: SYSTEM@CRNLNS.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re:  Ethernet Terminal Concentrators
Message-ID: <8705072249.AA26604@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Thu, 7-May-87 18:33:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8705072249.AA26604
Posted: Thu May  7 18:33:00 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 9-May-87 09:48:32 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 8

Thanks for the information about WIN/VX performance.

My tests of the CMU/TEK TCP/IP package were using CMU's "shared DEUNA"
code.  DECnet and LAT were also using the same hardware.
CMU's software uses DEC's XE driver, creating additional logical devices.
Obviously, I'll have to try to do another test using a separate DEUNA.

Selden