Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!ucbvax!A.ISI.EDU!CERF
From: CERF@A.ISI.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: question about FTP data channels
Message-ID: <[A.ISI.EDU].8-May-87.22:13:50.CERF>
Date: Fri, 8-May-87 22:13:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: <[A.ISI.EDU].8-May-87.22:13:50.CERF>
Posted: Fri May  8 22:13:00 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 10-May-87 01:29:57 EDT
References: <8705070357.AA28765@flash.bellcore.com>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 8

Phil,

don't you have to accommodate the case of third party transfers,
so that the control address is distinct from sender and receiver
of the file transfer? If that's so, then you can't very well bind
to the source address of the control process.

Vint