Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!decwrl!labrea!rocky!rokicki
From: rokicki@rocky.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Disk timings....
Message-ID: <297@rocky.STANFORD.EDU>
Date: Thu, 7-May-87 11:30:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: rocky.297
Posted: Thu May  7 11:30:40 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 9-May-87 06:13:03 EDT
References: <3406@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <498@speedy.mcnc.UUCP>
Organization: Stanford University Computer Science Department
Lines: 11
Summary: My values for CLTD 50Meg drive

> Cltd		17133	17133	17133	17133	12603	13512	13653	13797
Cltd		24272	24499	24499	24499	12787	18204	18859	19275
> Microbotics	14169	15984	16282	16384	9463	9602	9676	9745
> Side Track	25954	25450	25206	25700	14324	19275	19134	20641
> Xebec		32363	37991	37991	37991	12663	13239	13512	13639

Not *too* big of a difference, but Cltd doesn't look *quite* so bad.
Other values were close.  Cltd has promised a new, faster driver with
(I hear) up to 50% faster throughput . . .

-tom