Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: ProDOS 8 vs 16
Message-ID: <5858@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 14-May-87 18:29:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.5858
Posted: Thu May 14 18:29:11 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 16-May-87 11:37:31 EDT
References: <663@cod.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 9

In article <663@cod.UUCP> rupp@cod.UUCP (William L. Rupp) writes:
>Is there any change in the descriptive entry for files and
>subdirectories in ProDOS/16 as opposed to ProDOS/8?

I don't understand your terminology.  In any case,
ProDOS-8 and ProDOS-16 use exactly the same file system.
Indeed, which ProDOS is run on an Apple IIGS normally
depends entirely on which one the application requires.
I have a nice mixture on my hard disk.