Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!uwvax!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!vax135!cjp
From: cjp@vax135.UUCP (Charles Poirier)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.atari.st,comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: Better Windows? (multiple selection in icon interface)
Message-ID: <1765@vax135.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 18-May-87 12:29:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: vax135.1765
Posted: Mon May 18 12:29:54 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 19-May-87 04:37:17 EDT
References: <8705150704.AA05423@cogsci.berkeley.edu> <439@esl.UUCP> <689@omepd> <1800@lsuc.UUCP>
Reply-To: cjp@vax135.UUCP (Charles Poirier)
Followup-To: comp.windows.misc
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 21
Summary: A windows group exists!?
Xref: mnetor comp.sys.amiga:4942 comp.sys.mac:3294 comp.sys.atari.st:3567 comp.windows.misc:1

In article <1800@lsuc.UUCP> jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura) writes:
>In article <689@omepd> hah@isum.UUCP (Hans Hansen) writes:
>>Will you people who are following up on this topic please edit the
>>Newsgroups line and quit cross posting to a lot of very disinterested
>>users!
>The Net currently doesn't have a 'windows.general' group, and even

But it does!  Our News spool shows a (rather empty) "comp.windows.misc"
group.

>if it did, this discussion has the earmarks of a short term discussion
>wherein a few standards might be hacked out, but nothing longterm.

As I understand Nettiquette, if an appropriate group *already* exists,
it should be used regardless of the scale of the discussion.  I am
redirecting followups to comp.windows.misc.

-- 
	Charles Poirier   (decvax,ucbvax,ihnp4,attmail)!vax135!cjp

	"The road to Hell is paved with good opinions."