Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ptsfa!lll-tis!mordor!sri-spam!rutgers!gatech!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!cunyvm!ndsuvm1.bitnet!ud040164
From: ud040164@ndsuvm1.bitnet.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: good and bad disks
Message-ID: <193UD040164@NDSUVM1>
Date: Sat, 23-May-87 03:17:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: NDSUVM1.193UD040164
Posted: Sat May 23 03:17:38 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 27-May-87 04:46:40 EDT
References: <8705200729.AA10127@nps-cs.arpa> <1082@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> 1090@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu
Distribution: world
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computer Network, Fargo, ND
Lines: 10
DISCLAIMER: Author bears full responsibility for contents of this article.

In article <1090@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>, engst@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu (Adam C. Engst) says:
>
>I haven't had documented proof of Opus disks failing particularly, but I have
     
I have used about 50 Opus 5 1/4 disks without any complaints (other than the
stupid name, of course :)  Haven't tried out the 3 1/2, though.
>noticed a general trend that they will give more problems than Sony's.  My
>vote goes to staying away from the in general.  Moshe, try $14.50 for SS/ $18
dale
>                    Adam