Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi
From: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Unix for 80286 (was: Unix for 80386)
Message-ID: <610@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 15-May-87 19:36:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: bsu-cs.610
Posted: Fri May 15 19:36:14 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 17-May-87 00:59:07 EDT
References: <218@ndmath.UUCP> <570@bsu-cs.UUCP> <5976@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>
Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana
Lines: 17
Xref: utgpu comp.unix.questions:2062 comp.sys.ibm.pc:3599

In article <570@bsu-cs.UUCP> I wrote:
        I am running Microport System V/AT version 2.2L on an AT from
        PC's Limited.  Support for the two standard serial ports is
        good....

In article <5976@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> davidsen@kbsvax.steinmetz.UUCP 
(William E. Davidsen Jr) responded:
        Mport is a nice package, but I would not call the serial
        support good...
        [complaints deleted]
        ...All this on real IBM hardware, so it's not a compatibility
        problem.

Yes, it COULD be a compatiblity problem.  Perhaps you should be using an 
AT from PC's Limited.
-- 
Rahul Dhesi         UUCP:  {ihnp4,seismo}!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi