Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!steinmetz!davidsen From: davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Who sells PC/VI?: Now MKS Toolkit Message-ID: <6067@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> Date: Wed, 27-May-87 16:51:02 EDT Article-I.D.: steinmet.6067 Posted: Wed May 27 16:51:02 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 30-May-87 05:07:58 EDT References: <42900004@uicsrd| <413@qiclab.UUCP| <2168@tekgvs.TEK.COM| <242@mks.UUCP| <335@booboo.UUCP| Reply-To: davidsen@kbsvax.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) Distribution: comp Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY Lines: 63 In article <335@booboo.UUCP| amir@booboo.UUCP (Amir Majidimehr) writes: |In article <242@mks.UUCP|, alex@mks.UUCP writes: || In article <2596@watdragon.UUCP|, absary@watdragon.UUCP (Al Sary) writes: || | |On a scale of 1 to 10 I give MKS a 9. They only lose 1 point because || | |I can't figure out how to send things to the printer without || | |invoking command.com - and staying there while the printer finishes. || | || | I discovered the same problem; I don't know how to get around it either. || | || | I am not sure I would scale it at 9 for reliability just yet. Our || | ... stuff ... | |The release 2.0 (or whatever came out in January) was a fiasco. I bought Because it wasn't bug free? | | ... more stuff deleted ... |How could you send out the ksh in the state that it was in? I have *never* |had a buggier piece of software in my life (public domain included)! It ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ lucky you! |crashed the machine every four or five commands (either hangs or refusing |to execute any commands). I finally lost so much work that had to revert |back to command.com. There were (still are) a few sequences which cause problems, and it doesn't LIKE to run on a fast system (don't ask me why a command processor is timing sensitive, it is). ... stuff deleted ... | || To set the record straight on what will be in the next release of the toolkit, || version 2.2 it is as follows: || pr fold expand unexpand uname env deroff fmt pack unpack pcat || new AWK -multi-dimension arrays, symtab, garbage collection. || New SH - vi&emacs editing mode and many small things || VI - ega-support for |24 lines || login, init, passwd | |I wish you would spend more time fixing useful commands than coming up with |yet another "awk" command. Do you really think people use awk more than ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not another, just complete yes. |vi and ksh? By the way, "vi&emacs" editing are an essential part of ksh. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Your opinion only. Many people want the loop constructs, etc, and find that the editing is nice, but not essential. I would use ksh even if it had no interface but to read command files. I can do things I couldn't do in command.com with any trickery. |How could you omit them in the first version and still call it ksh? | || Date for release 2.2 is not set yet - we hope to go to beta release at the || end of this month, with real release by June. But no promises! || |And let me guess. You are going to charge for this release, right? Did you expect that buying one copy would give you a lifetime supply? With rare exceptions all companies have to charge for updates. ... more electrons saved here ... -- bill davidsen sixhub \ ARPA: wedu@ge-crd.arpa ihnp4!seismo!rochester!steinmetz -> crdos1!davidsen chinet / "Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward"