Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!seismo!munnari!moncskermit!goanna!yabbie!rcopm From: rcopm@yabbie.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Re: MacApp Licensing Fee Message-ID: <500@yabbie.oz> Date: Tue, 12-May-87 23:57:37 EDT Article-I.D.: yabbie.500 Posted: Tue May 12 23:57:37 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 16-May-87 08:48:02 EDT References: <3115@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> Organization: RMIT Comm & Elec Eng, Melbourne, Australia. Lines: 41 In tribute to... The on-going saga of "I thought of it (maybe not first), You pay for it, and will do so for the rest of my natural life " Joel West writes... > If there were a competing product to MacApp without royalties, I'd be > interested, but right now it offers unique advantages. Thats Funny, Think and Xerox could have said something similar about their products (while they were still unique - in Xerox's case). Oh, sorry, I forgot that *ALL* the Dolphin and Dorado (not to mention SmallTalk) creators were/are employed by Apple at some stage or another :-]. Thus Apple owns their thoughts, even though some of them don't work there any more. OK so Xerox has a finger in Apple's pie, so what? All credit to Apple for producing a beautiful series of machines. All credit to Apple for producing a wonderful user interface. All credit to Apple for Challenging the IBM Monopoly. What do they want to be now? A Monopoly? Or "Thought Police?" Read your own Technical Notes, Apple! A Compiler is a compiler! Homage is paid since the only machines that MacApp (currently) works on are Apples. So why the Royalty? No excuses, No BS! Paul Menon. Dept of Communication & Electronic Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, 124 Latrobe St, Melbourne, 3000, Australia ACSnet: rcopm@yabbie UUCP: ...!seismo!munnari!yabbie.rmit.oz!rcopm CSNET: rcopm@yabbie.rmit.oz ARPA: rcopm%yabbie.rmit.oz@seismo BITNET: rcopm%yabbie.rmit.oz@CSNET-RELAY PHONE: +61 3 660 2619.