Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!seismo!mcvax!ukc!stc!idec!kbsc!SouthBank!thompsn From: thompsn@SouthBank.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: MacApp Licensing Fee Message-ID: <624@SouthBank.UUCP> Date: Wed, 20-May-87 15:55:13 EDT Article-I.D.: SouthBan.624 Posted: Wed May 20 15:55:13 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 23-May-87 08:33:27 EDT References: <3113@sunybcs.UUCP> <174400030@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu> <727@apple.UUCP> <742@apple.UUCP> Organization: South Bank Polytechnic, London, UK Lines: 34 Summary: Apple is justified in charging this fee. About the problem of a $100 licence ($10 if you are giving it away). Larry, I for one would like to thank Apple for the MacApp product. I have been using MacApp for some two weeks now. I have produced a couple of demo applications (kinda feeling my way). There is no way that I could have done what I have done (albeit not much) in the time using conventional development systems. I saw Barry Haines (hope that is spelt right) of Apple Computer at an OOP conference in London. He demo'd MacApp and a version of Smalltalk with MacApp in st-80. Apple seem to have dedicated a lot of time and effort to MacApp and is, I feel, totally justified in protecting its property. To the people that wish to criticise I ask you this: $100 is not a lot to pay for a development system with this much potential. I have seen people charging $1000+ for Lisp systems. MPW + Object Pascal + MacApp is going to cost around $400, which is what you would pay for an MS-Dos compiler. Add the cost of Windows development kit and you still dont get as much for twice the price (get as much for your money). Pay the licence out of the money you save, and think of the time you are going to save in the future. Nick Thompson. -- Nick Thompson. ..mcvax!ukc!idec!kbsc!lawesn South Bank Poly & Imperial College, London. Phone +44 1 858 4371 c/o 53 Maze Hill, Greenwich, London, SE10 8XQ, UK. "A turkey with a PhD is still a turkey"