Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!husc6!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!oliveb!sun!plaid!chuq
From: chuq%plaid@Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach)
Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop
Subject: Printing
Message-ID: <18408@sun.uucp>
Date: Fri, 8-May-87 13:55:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: sun.18408
Posted: Fri May  8 13:55:33 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 9-May-87 21:15:06 EDT
Sender: news@sun.uucp
Distribution: comp
Lines: 32
Approved: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com

Date: Thu, 7 May 87 10:45:45 edt
From: seismo!mirror.TMC.COM!rs (Rich Salz)

I would not buy photocopy equipment, because it does seem like you'll
eventually want/need to go to offset.  I would find myself a good,
large-sized copy house.  Sit down with them and explain your plans.  A
smart rep -- not some bozo behind the counter who sticks pages in the
feeder -- can help you analyze and balance the trade-offs.  Large
copy-houses also provide offset (part of my definition of large :-)
printing, collating, etc.

In general, I think offset wins when
		    # copies >> # pages
or if # copies is fairly large -- a couple of hundred.  It seems to
need that kind of balance to average out the high set-up effort
needed for each offset "signature" (clump of four pages).  [Okay,
it's not really a signature; I just don't remember the right term.]

On the other hand, if you're willing to hand-insert special sheets,
you can get full-color copies with photostat.  Also, I've seen pretty
reasonable results from both the Kodak and Xerox "thesis-quality"
copiers by just placing a half-tone screen on the glass with your
contone or photograph.
	/rich $alz

----------------------------------------
Submissions to:   desktop%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop
Administrivia to: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid@desktop-request
Paths:  {ihnp4,decwrl,hplabs,seismo,ucbvax}!sun
Chuq Von Rospach	chuq@sun.COM		[I don't read flames]

There is no statute of limitations on stupidity