Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!mcvax!ukc!dcl-cs!bath63!cc_is
From: cc_is@bath63.UUCP
Newsgroups: news.admin,news.groups
Subject: Re: net.sources -> ?
Message-ID: <1148@bath63.ux63.bath.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 15-May-87 05:27:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: bath63.1148
Posted: Fri May 15 05:27:28 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 16-May-87 21:04:24 EDT
References: <696@van-bc.UUCP> <609@percival.UUCP>
Reply-To: cc_is@ux63.bath.ac.uk (Sparry)
Organization: University of Bath, England
Lines: 9
Xref: utgpu news.admin:389 news.groups:758

Multiple moderators are a good idea. Why should we in Europe pay to send
our submissions across the 'pond', just to have them returned in the news.
comp.sources.misc is moderated (I understand) just to remove the noise,
and not to apply any standards. (I think this is good).
-- 
Mr I. W. J.  Sparry	Phone:	+44 225 826826 x 5983
University of Bath	JANET:	cc_is@UK.AC.BATH.UX63
Bath BA2 7AY		UUCP:	seismo!mcvax!ukc!bath63!cc_is (bath63.UUCP)
England			ARPA:	cc_is%ux63.bath.ac.uk@ucl-cs.arpa