Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!oliveb!sun!plaid!chuq From: chuq%plaid@Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) Newsgroups: news.misc Subject: Re: Binaries/Shareware Message-ID: <19648@sun.uucp> Date: Tue, 26-May-87 01:48:48 EDT Article-I.D.: sun.19648 Posted: Tue May 26 01:48:48 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 27-May-87 01:08:23 EDT References: <315@pcrat.UUCP> Sender: news@sun.uucp Reply-To: chuq@sun.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach) Organization: Fictional Reality, uLtd Lines: 45 Keywords: Expensive >I'm now a 'paying' USENET member (by virtue of the uunet experiment), >I've been watching my phone costs using Jack Bonn's 'uucost' program. >I've subscribed to all the source groups. Tonight I waited while 45 >minutes of traffic came in over comp.sources.misc. I could hardly > ------- >contain myself waiting to see what new goodies the net had brought >me. Well, I was struck down with disappointment when I discovered >that the $2.25 I just spent was: > 1) A REPOST of > 2) A UUENCODED, BINARY copy of > 3) A SHAREWARE program (ARC520), which > 4) You can get on nearly any local RBBS > >This came through a MODERATED group. I was under the impression that >items 2) and 3) were strictly forbidden on the net. And I thought >that the delays of having a moderated group were supposed to be >balanced by the benefits of eliminating these sort of postings. >I certainly didn't want to spend the money for this. Any net-guru's >care to comment? Yes, we had this argument, what, a year ago? Lots of yelling, the result being that (basically) this is a net with lots of different people and interests, and not everything out there is going to be (or should be) of interest to everyone. That's the breaks. You found a case of something that you can't use, but is of use to lots of other people. That happens. So, two comments: o Isn't it wonderful that we live in a world where so many needs can be serviced at a relatively low cost? And that there ARE so many different viewpoints and sources of informations? o If we ARE going to restart this argument, can someone please let me know when it is over so I can resubscrive to the group? (As a side comment, traditionally when these flame wars start up, the argument takes up a LOT more net bandwidth than the original "problem" and gets a lot less accomplished) Enjoy diversity! chuq Chuq Von Rospach chuq@sun.COM [I don't read flames] There is no statute of limitations on stupidity