Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!harvard!ksr!alcatraz!benson From: benson@alcatraz.ksr.com (Benson Margulies) Newsgroups: news.misc Subject: Re: A meta-comment, and a suggestion. Message-ID: <158@ksr.UUCP> Date: Sat, 30-May-87 18:30:52 EDT Article-I.D.: ksr.158 Posted: Sat May 30 18:30:52 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 2-Jun-87 01:02:29 EDT References: <1446@hoxna.UUCP> <3230002@nucsrl.UUCP> Sender: nobody@ksr.UUCP Reply-To: benson@ksr.UUCP (Benson Margulies) Organization: Kendall Square Research, Cambridge MA Lines: 48 This is really quite a spectacle. Someone asks a sysop to pull mark's access to soc.women over a matter of so-called net ettiquette. That person might or might not have had a point. A discussion of the idea in net.misc is not an unreasonable result. The discussion moves here. A collection of selfrighteous flamers move their ready-at-the-drop-of-a-hat attacks on mark in here. (selfrighteous: omygodthenetisgodsgifttoallofusandifgodforbiditshouldgoaway itwillbetheendoftheworldsoletsstomponanyonewhodoesanythingcontroversialby ournarrowmindedstandards ) (usual disclaimer: I'm responding to what I've seen in this newsgroup, not anything that may have been said, done, aledged, or forged elsewhere or elsewhen.) Then the selfsame characters flame that mark is polluting news.misc. The attitudes on display here show that mark can't possibly add an increment of pollution to the net, at least on the subject of gender relations. When, and if, the people asking for this discussion to leave news.misc learn to stop tossing in gratuitous insults to mark, women, and feminists, then there is some chance that this discussion will go away. Until then, kiddies, find your j key. Because I for one consider it a net issue, not a soc issue, that people can in one line say "let's not talk about this in news.misc", and on the next say "feminists would never permit a men only newsgroup." I am in no position to speak for feminists in general, but I can tell you with great assurance that many feminists would be overjoyed to see men talking out their more unsavory beliefs where the feminists didn't have to see them. At the political principle goes: its the job of members of the opressing group to fix their heads, not the job of the oppressed to fix them for them. Benson I. Margulies Kendall Square Research Corp. harvard!ksr!benson All comments the responsibility ksr!benson@harvard.harvard.edu of the author, if anyone.