Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!princeton!allegra!amdcad!phil
From: phil@amdcad.UUCP
Newsgroups: news.misc,soc.women
Subject: Re: retraction
Message-ID: <16937@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Date: Mon, 1-Jun-87 13:40:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdcad.16937
Posted: Mon Jun  1 13:40:25 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 3-Jun-87 01:15:59 EDT
References: <9729@clyde.ATT.COM> <3767@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <16895@amdcad.AMD.COM> <3788@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Sunnyvale, Ca.
Lines: 13
Xref: mnetor news.misc:501 soc.women:4150

In article <3788@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> era1987@violet.berkeley.edu () writes:
<I've reported what they told me.  If you want further details, why not
<ask some of the people from the Well who have been making personal attacks
<on me here, to supply the details here instead?  I'm interested to know
<why they would censor feminist or egalitarian views, but not censor porn,
<obscenity or swastikas.

I'm sorry, I came in in the middle. But it seems hard to believe anyone
would turn off an account just because it was being used by a feminist.

-- 
Bumper Snicker: If this car were a horse, it would have to be shot!
Phil Ngai, {ucbvax,decwrl,allegra}!amdcad!phil or amdcad!phil@decwrl.dec.com