Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!mcvax!ukc!eagle!rjf
From: rjf@eagle.UUCP
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
Subject: Re: Just a test
Message-ID: <3013@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 19-May-87 08:47:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: eagle.3013
Posted: Tue May 19 08:47:46 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 21-May-87 06:16:47 EDT
References: <7585@orchid.UUCP> <1199@super.upenn.edu.upenn.edu>
Reply-To: rjf@ukc.ac.uk (R.J.Faichney)
Distribution: sci
Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.
Lines: 14

Summary:
Expires:
Sender:
Followup-To:

In article <1199@super.upenn.edu.upenn.edu> shaffer@operations.dccs.upenn.edu.UUCP (Earl Shaffer) writes:
>Yes, is anyone there?
>

Yes - me. And I would like to know if anyone agrees with me that the Strong
Anthropic Principle (if that's the correct nomenclature) really reduces to

	We observe, therefore we are, therefore we observe.. [repeating]

(Maybe followupers (if any!) should change the subject line.)

(Sorry if the previous version of this escaped before I killed it.)

Robin Faichney   rjf@uk.ac.ukc   ...!mcvax!ukc!rjf